By

In Nevada, the defense of laches is available where delay by one party results in a disadvantage to the other such that the party seeking the defense of laches had a change in circumstances which would make granting relief to the delaying party inequitable.  Building & Constr. Trades v. Public Works, 108 Nev. 605,839 P.2d 633, 637 (1992).  The delay must cause actual prejudice.  Memory Gardens v. Pet Ponderosas, 88 Nev. 1, 4, 492 P.2d 123, 124 (1972).  The condition of the party asserting laches must become drastically altered, whereby it cannot be restored to its former state.  State v. Rosenthal, 107 Nev. 772, 819 P.2d 1296 (1991).  In circumstances where the statute of limitations has not run on an action, especially strong circumstances must exist to sustain the defense of laches.  Building & Constr. Trades v. Public Works, 108 Nev. 605,839 P.2d 633, 637 (1992).

 

See elements for other claims at the Nevada Law Library

About the Author

Jay Young is a Las Vegas, Nevada attorney. His practice focuses on acting as an Arbitrator and Mediator.

Mr. Young can be reached at 702.667.4868 or at jay@h2law.com.

The information provided on this site does not, and is not intended to constitute legal advice. You understand each legal matter should be considered to be unique and subject to varying results. You should not take or refrain from taking action based on any information contained on this website without first consulting legal counsel, as it is not intended to advise you on your particular matter. Further, you understand that no guarantee is given that the information contained herein is an accurate statement of the law at any given point in time, as the law is constantly changing. Please see http://nevadalaw.info/disclaimer

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: