Skip to content

Nevada Law Blog

Jay Young | Retired Las Vegas, Nevada Judge | Mediator | Arbitrator | Special Master

  • Home
  • Jay Young ADR Services
  • Nevada Mediation Resources
  • Nevada Arbitration Resources
  • Special Master Resources
  • Books by Jay Young
  • Nevada Litigation Resources
  • Nevada Causes of Action
  • Discovery Digest
  • Toggle search form

Month: October 2018

Nevada Statutes of Limitation and the Discovery Rule

Posted on October 30, 2018February 18, 2025 By Jay Young

Statutes of limitation are designed to assure fairness to parties and prevent surprise lawsuits by determining the maximum time allowed after an event within which legal proceedings may be initiated.  As a practical matter, statutes of limitation avoid fraud on the court by disallowing claims to linger “until evidence has been lost, memories have faded, and witnesses have disappeared.”  In re Jim L. Shetakis Distrib. Co., 415 B.R. 791, 799 (D. Nev. 2009) aff’d, 401 F. App’x 249 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Burnett v. N.Y. Cent. R.R. Co., 380 U.S. 424, 428, 85 S.Ct. 1050, 13 L.Ed.2d 941 (1965) (as quoted in Oltman v. Holland America Line, Inc., 538 F.3d 1271, 1278 (9th Cir. 2008))).  The appropriate accrual date after which a claim may not be filed is a question of law if the facts are uncontroverted.  Winn v. Sunrise Hosp. & Med. Ctr., 277 P.3d 458, 463 (2012).

The time allowed to file a claim may be extended pursuant to the “discovery rule”, which is also known as the inquiry notice doctrine.  The discovery rule is available when fairness dictates that the plaintiff should be allowed more time to file her claim because the nature of the claim was hidden from her somehow.  Claimants must demonstrate the reasons or excuses why the statute should be tolled.  Siragusa v. Brown, 971 P.2d 801, 807 (Nev. 1998).  “This rule requires a plaintiff to use due diligence in determining the existence of a cause of action and delays the accrual of the cause of action until the plaintiff obtains inquiry notice. Bemis v. Estate of Bemis, 114 Nev. 1021, 1025, 967 P.2d 437, 440 (1998) (applying the inquiry notice standard to determine when the applicable statute of limitations ran).”

Read More “Nevada Statutes of Limitation and the Discovery Rule” »

Jay Young | Retired Las Vegas, Nevada Judge | Mediator | Arbitrator | Special Master
Jay Young

Hon. Jay Young (Ret.) is a retired judicial officer with decades of experience presiding over complex civil litigation matters. Following a distinguished career on the bench, Judge Young now serves as a mediator, arbitrator, and court‑appointed special master, and discovery referee.  Judge Young brings a disciplined, impartial, and results‑oriented approach to dispute resolution. Judge Young is based in Nevada and accepts appointments statewide and nationally, subject to agreement or court order. He can be reached at 855.777.4557 or info@armadr.com

Known for judicial temperament, analytical rigor, and practical problem‑solving, Judge Young assists litigants and counsel in resolving high‑stakes disputes efficiently and with integrity and employing best practices. He is recognized by U.S. News and World Report’s publication Best Lawyers as Arbitration Lawyer of the Year.

nevadalawinfo.wordpress.com

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading…
Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator

Sample Motion for Leave to File Pleading in Excess of Page Limit in Nevada Federal Court

Posted on October 23, 2018 By Jay Young

“The court looks with disfavor on motions to exceed page limits, so permission to do so will not be routinely granted.”  LR 7-3(c).   [INSERT CAPTION]   [PARTY NAME] hereby moves this Court, pursuant to Rule 7-3 of this Court’s Local Rules of Civil Procedure, for an Order granting [INSERT PARTY NAME] leave to file…

Read More “Sample Motion for Leave to File Pleading in Excess of Page Limit in Nevada Federal Court” »

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading…
Litigation

Civil Conspiracy and the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine in Nevada

Posted on October 15, 2018 By Jay Young

In Nevada, a claim for civil conspiracy requires: (1) two or more parties; (2) acting in concert; (3) with an intent to accomplish an unlawful objective for the purpose of harming another; and (4) damages. Consolidated Generator-Nevada Inc. v. Cummins Engine Co., Inc., 114 Nev. 1304, 1311, 917 P.2d 1251, 1256 (1998).  When alleging civil…

Read More “Civil Conspiracy and the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine in Nevada” »

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading…
Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator

Nevada Law Defines Superseding Intervening Cause

Posted on October 8, 2018 By Jay Young

The law in Nevada has consistently held that a superseding intervening cause is an interfering act that overcomes the original culpable act, and where the intervening act is an unforeseeable, independent, non-concurrent cause of the injury. Thomas v. Bokelman, 86 Nev. 10, 13, 462 P.2d 1020, 1022 (1970) (a negligence action will not stand when…

Read More “Nevada Law Defines Superseding Intervening Cause” »

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading…
J, Litigation

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

  • Advanced Resolution Management

Visitor

3414271

Trending Posts

Archives

  •  2026
    • Feb 2026
    • Jan 2026
  •  2025
    • Dec 2025
    • Nov 2025
    • Oct 2025
    • Sep 2025
    • Aug 2025
    • Jul 2025
    • Feb 2025
    • Jan 2025
  •  2024
    • Dec 2024
    • Nov 2024
    • Oct 2024
    • Aug 2024
    • May 2024
    • Mar 2024
    • Feb 2024
    • Jan 2024
  •  2021
    • Mar 2021
    • Feb 2021
    • Jan 2021
  •  2020
    • Dec 2020
    • Nov 2020
    • Oct 2020
    • Sep 2020
    • Aug 2020
    • Jul 2020
    • Jun 2020
    • May 2020
    • Apr 2020
    • Mar 2020
    • Jan 2020
  •  2019
    • Dec 2019
    • Nov 2019
    • Oct 2019
    • Sep 2019
    • Aug 2019
    • Apr 2019
    • Mar 2019
    • Feb 2019
    • Jan 2019
  •  2018
    • Dec 2018
    • Nov 2018
    • Oct 2018
    • Sep 2018
    • Aug 2018
    • Jul 2018
    • Mar 2018
    • Feb 2018
  •  2017
    • Nov 2017
    • Oct 2017
    • Sep 2017
    • Aug 2017
    • Jul 2017
    • Jun 2017
    • May 2017
    • Apr 2017
    • Mar 2017
    • Feb 2017
  •  2016
    • Sep 2016
    • Aug 2016
    • Jul 2016
    • Jun 2016
    • May 2016
    • Apr 2016
    • Mar 2016
    • Feb 2016
    • Jan 2016
  •  2015
    • Dec 2015
    • Nov 2015
    • Oct 2015
    • Sep 2015
    • Aug 2015
    • Jul 2015
    • Jun 2015
    • May 2015
    • Apr 2015
    • Mar 2015
    • Feb 2015
  •  2013
    • Jul 2013
Disclaimer
Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Nevada Law Blog.

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme

Loading Comments...

    %d