Skip to content

Nevada Law Blog

Jay Young | Retired Las Vegas, Nevada Judge | Mediator | Arbitrator | Special Master

  • Home
  • Jay Young ADR Services
  • Nevada Mediation Resources
  • Nevada Arbitration Resources
  • Special Master Resources
  • Books by Jay Young
  • Nevada Litigation Resources
  • Nevada Causes of Action
  • Discovery Digest
  • Toggle search form

Month: March 2016

Nevada Supreme Court Determines That Waiver of the Right to Arbitrate Must be Decided by the Courts

Posted on March 31, 2016February 12, 2026 By Jay Young No Comments on Nevada Supreme Court Determines That Waiver of the Right to Arbitrate Must be Decided by the Courts

The Nevada Supreme Court recently decided that the waiver of the right to arbitrate a dispute is presumptively within the jurisdiction of the courts, not arbitrators to decide unless the arbitration agreement clearly reserves this question of arbitrability to the arbitrator.  That is if the claimed waiver arises from litigation conduct.

The case involves claims against a payday lender who obtained, according to the court, “thousands of default judgments” against defendants who failed to appear in collection actions brought after default on the short term loans.  Plaintiffs sued as a class to, inter alia, have the court deem the default judgments void and uncollectable when it was learned that the lender’s process server engaged in “sewer service—the practice of accepting summonses and complaints for service, failing to serve them, then falsely swearing in court-filed affidavits that service had been made when it was not.”

The lender’s motion to compel arbitration based on agreements to arbitrate was denied when the District Court held the lender waived its right to arbitration by bringing the collections actions and obtaining the default judgments at issue. 

Read More “Nevada Supreme Court Determines That Waiver of the Right to Arbitrate Must be Decided by the Courts” »

Jay Young | Retired Las Vegas, Nevada Judge | Mediator | Arbitrator | Special Master
Jay Young

Hon. Jay Young (Ret.) is a retired judicial officer with decades of experience presiding over complex civil litigation matters. Following a distinguished career on the bench, Judge Young now serves as a mediator, arbitrator, and court‑appointed special master, and discovery referee.  Judge Young brings a disciplined, impartial, and results‑oriented approach to dispute resolution. Judge Young is based in Nevada and accepts appointments statewide and nationally, subject to agreement or court order. He can be reached at 855.777.4557 or info@armadr.com

Known for judicial temperament, analytical rigor, and practical problem‑solving, Judge Young assists litigants and counsel in resolving high‑stakes disputes efficiently and with integrity and employing best practices. He is recognized by U.S. News and World Report’s publication Best Lawyers as Arbitration Lawyer of the Year.

nevadalawinfo.wordpress.com

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration Arbitrator, Business Law, J, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator, Litigation, Mediation Mediator

Elements for the Defense of Waiver in Nevada

Posted on March 24, 2016January 9, 2024 By Jay Young No Comments on Elements for the Defense of Waiver in Nevada

In Nevada, the defense of waiver is available where: A voluntary and intentional express or implied relinquishment of a known right; and Made with full knowledge of all material facts. Udevco, Inc. v. Wagner, 100 Nev. 185, 189, 678 P.2d 679, 682 (1984). Jay YoungHon. Jay Young (Ret.) is a retired judicial officer with decades…

Read More “Elements for the Defense of Waiver in Nevada” »

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
J, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator, Litigation

Usury Laws in Nevada

Posted on March 22, 2016 By Jay Young No Comments on Usury Laws in Nevada

Generally

Nevada has no limit on the rate of interest to which parties may agree so long as the agreement reflects an arms-length transaction.[1]  Further, Nevada allows compound interest on loans.[2]

Pawnbrokers and Short Term Loans

Although Nevada does not have a general limitation on interest rates, certain transactions and business are subject to interest rate and other restrictions.  Pawnbrokers are prohibited from charging more than 13% interest per month on any loan of money secured by personal property

Read More “Usury Laws in Nevada” »

Jay Young | Retired Las Vegas, Nevada Judge | Mediator | Arbitrator | Special Master
Jay Young

Hon. Jay Young (Ret.) is a retired judicial officer with decades of experience presiding over complex civil litigation matters. Following a distinguished career on the bench, Judge Young now serves as a mediator, arbitrator, and court‑appointed special master, and discovery referee.  Judge Young brings a disciplined, impartial, and results‑oriented approach to dispute resolution. Judge Young is based in Nevada and accepts appointments statewide and nationally, subject to agreement or court order. He can be reached at 855.777.4557 or info@armadr.com

Known for judicial temperament, analytical rigor, and practical problem‑solving, Judge Young assists litigants and counsel in resolving high‑stakes disputes efficiently and with integrity and employing best practices. He is recognized by U.S. News and World Report’s publication Best Lawyers as Arbitration Lawyer of the Year.

nevadalawinfo.wordpress.com

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Business Law, J, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator

Elements for the Claim of Unjust Enrichment in Nevada

Posted on March 19, 2016January 9, 2024 By Jay Young No Comments on Elements for the Claim of Unjust Enrichment in Nevada

QUANTUM MERUIT OR QUASI CONTRACT In Nevada, the elements for a claim unjust enrichment or quantum meruit are: A benefit has been conferred upon the defendant; Defendant appreciated the benefit; Defendant accepted and retained the benefit under circumstances where it would be inequitable for Defendant to retain the benefit without the payment of value for…

Read More “Elements for the Claim of Unjust Enrichment in Nevada” »

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
J, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator, Litigation

Elements for the Claim of Usurpation of Corporate Opportunity in Nevada

Posted on March 17, 2016January 9, 2024 By Jay Young No Comments on Elements for the Claim of Usurpation of Corporate Opportunity in Nevada

In Nevada, the elements for a claim usurpation of corporate opportunity are: Defendant is a fiduciary to a company; Defendant appropriates for her own use, an opportunity that should belong to the company; The competing business is operated to the detriment of the Plaintiff company; Defendant has an interest or expectancy in the competing business’s…

Read More “Elements for the Claim of Usurpation of Corporate Opportunity in Nevada” »

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Business Law, Corporate Governance, J, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator, Litigation

The Unclean Hands Doctrine in Nevada

Posted on March 12, 2016January 9, 2024 By Jay Young No Comments on The Unclean Hands Doctrine in Nevada

In Nevada, the defense of the doctrine of unclean hands “derives from the equitable maxim that ‘he who comes into equity must come with clean hands.’ ”  Omega Industries, Inc. v. Raffaele, 894 F.Supp. 1425, 1431 (D.Nev.1995) (quoting Ellenburg v. Brockway, Inc., 763 F.2d 1091, 1097 (9th Cir. 1985)).  The doctrine bars relief to a party…

Read More “The Unclean Hands Doctrine in Nevada” »

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
J, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator, Litigation

Elements for a Claim of Unfair Competition (False Designation of Origin, Description, and Dilution)

Posted on March 10, 2016January 9, 2024 By Jay Young No Comments on Elements for a Claim of Unfair Competition (False Designation of Origin, Description, and Dilution)

The Lanham Act prohibits unfair competition. See 15 U.S.C. § 1125. 15 U.S.C. § 1125. False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden (a) Civil action (1) Any person who, on or in connection with any goods or services, or any container for goods, uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or devise,…

Read More “Elements for a Claim of Unfair Competition (False Designation of Origin, Description, and Dilution)” »

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Business Law, J, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator, Litigation

Elements for a Claim of Trespass in Nevada

Posted on March 5, 2016January 9, 2024 By Jay Young 3 Comments on Elements for a Claim of Trespass in Nevada

In Nevada, the elements for a claim civil trespass are: Invasion upon property of another; Defendant acted intentionally to intrude; and Causation and damages. Bradley v. Am. Smelting & Ref. Co., 104 Wash.2d 677, 692-693 (1985); Lied v. Clark County, 94 Nev. 171, 173-174, 579 P.2d 275 (1978). Jay YoungHon. Jay Young (Ret.) is a…

Read More “Elements for a Claim of Trespass in Nevada” »

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
J, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator, Litigation

Elements for a Claim of Unfair Competition (False Advertising)

Posted on March 3, 2016January 9, 2024 By Jay Young No Comments on Elements for a Claim of Unfair Competition (False Advertising)

The elements of a Lanham Act false advertising claim are as follows:

  • the defendant made a false or misleading statement of fact in a commercial advertisement about a product;
  • the statement either deceived or had the capacity to deceive a substantial segment of potential consumers;
  • the deception is material, in that it is likely to influence the con­sumer’s purchasing decision;
  • the product is in interstate commerce; and
  • the plaintiff has been or is likely to be injured as a result of the statement.

See, e.g., Cook, Perkiss and Liehe, Inc. v. N. Cal. Collection Serv., Inc., 911 F.2d 242, 244 (9th Cir. 2000); Clorox Co. Puerto Rico v. Procter & Gamble Commercial Co., 228 F.3d 24, 33 n.6 (1st Cir. 2000); Pizza Hut, Inc. v. Papa John’s Int’l, Inc., 227 F.3d 489, 495 (5th Cir. 2000); Balance Dynamics Corp. v. Schmitt Indus., 204 F.3d 683, 689 (6th Cir. 2000); United Indus. Corp. v. Clorox Co., 140 F.3d 1175, 1180 (8th Cir. 1998); Johnson & Johnson-Merck Consumer Pharm. Co. v. Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Pharm., Inc., 19 F.3d 125, 129 (3d Cir. 1994); Skil Corp. v. Rockwell Int’l Corp., 375 F. Supp. 777 (N.D. Ill. 1974).

Read More “Elements for a Claim of Unfair Competition (False Advertising)” »

Jay Young | Retired Las Vegas, Nevada Judge | Mediator | Arbitrator | Special Master
Jay Young

Hon. Jay Young (Ret.) is a retired judicial officer with decades of experience presiding over complex civil litigation matters. Following a distinguished career on the bench, Judge Young now serves as a mediator, arbitrator, and court‑appointed special master, and discovery referee.  Judge Young brings a disciplined, impartial, and results‑oriented approach to dispute resolution. Judge Young is based in Nevada and accepts appointments statewide and nationally, subject to agreement or court order. He can be reached at 855.777.4557 or info@armadr.com

Known for judicial temperament, analytical rigor, and practical problem‑solving, Judge Young assists litigants and counsel in resolving high‑stakes disputes efficiently and with integrity and employing best practices. He is recognized by U.S. News and World Report’s publication Best Lawyers as Arbitration Lawyer of the Year.

nevadalawinfo.wordpress.com

Share this:

  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Business Law, J, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator, Litigation

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

  • Advanced Resolution Management

Visitor

3382503

Trending Posts

Archives

  •  2026
    • Feb 2026
    • Jan 2026
  •  2025
    • Dec 2025
    • Nov 2025
    • Oct 2025
    • Sep 2025
    • Aug 2025
    • Jul 2025
    • Feb 2025
    • Jan 2025
  •  2024
    • Dec 2024
    • Nov 2024
    • Oct 2024
    • Aug 2024
    • May 2024
    • Mar 2024
    • Feb 2024
    • Jan 2024
  •  2021
    • Mar 2021
    • Feb 2021
    • Jan 2021
  •  2020
    • Dec 2020
    • Nov 2020
    • Oct 2020
    • Sep 2020
    • Aug 2020
    • Jul 2020
    • Jun 2020
    • May 2020
    • Apr 2020
    • Mar 2020
    • Jan 2020
  •  2019
    • Dec 2019
    • Nov 2019
    • Oct 2019
    • Sep 2019
    • Aug 2019
    • Apr 2019
    • Mar 2019
    • Feb 2019
    • Jan 2019
  •  2018
    • Dec 2018
    • Nov 2018
    • Oct 2018
    • Sep 2018
    • Aug 2018
    • Jul 2018
    • Mar 2018
    • Feb 2018
  •  2017
    • Nov 2017
    • Oct 2017
    • Sep 2017
    • Aug 2017
    • Jul 2017
    • Jun 2017
    • May 2017
    • Apr 2017
    • Mar 2017
    • Feb 2017
  •  2016
    • Sep 2016
    • Aug 2016
    • Jul 2016
    • Jun 2016
    • May 2016
    • Apr 2016
    • Mar 2016
    • Feb 2016
    • Jan 2016
  •  2015
    • Dec 2015
    • Nov 2015
    • Oct 2015
    • Sep 2015
    • Aug 2015
    • Jul 2015
    • Jun 2015
    • May 2015
    • Apr 2015
    • Mar 2015
    • Feb 2015
  •  2013
    • Jul 2013
Disclaimer
Contact Us

Copyright © 2026 Nevada Law Blog.

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme

 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d