Skip to content

Nevada Law Blog

Jay Young | Top Las Vegas Mediator, Arbitrator & Special Master

  • Home
  • Jay Young ADR Services
  • Nevada Mediation Resources
  • Nevada Arbitration Resources
  • Special Master Resources
  • Books by Jay Young
  • Nevada Litigation Resources
  • Nevada Causes of Action
  • Discovery Digest
  • Toggle search form

Category: Arbitration Arbitrator

NEVADA SHORT TRIAL RULES

Posted on October 17, 2024 By Jay Young No Comments on NEVADA SHORT TRIAL RULES

I.  SCOPE OF RULES

      Rule 1.  The short trial program.

      (a)  Purpose.  The purpose of the short trial program is to expedite civil trials through procedures designed to control the length of the trial, including, without limitation, restrictions on discovery, the use of smaller juries, and time limits for presentation of evidence.

      (b)  Availability of program.  The short trial program is mandatory in judicial districts subject to the mandatory arbitration program. In all other judicial districts, establishment of a short trial program is voluntary and the judicial district may adopt local rules implementing all or part of the short trial program.

Read More “NEVADA SHORT TRIAL RULES” »

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration Arbitrator, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator, Mediation Mediator

Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure; Rule 51

Posted on October 17, 2024 By Jay Young No Comments on Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure; Rule 51

Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 51. Instructions to the Jury; Objections; Preserving a Claim of Error (a)      Requests. (1)    Before or at the Close of the Evidence. At the close of the evidence or at any earlier reasonable time that the court orders, a party may file and furnish to every other party written…

Read More “Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure; Rule 51” »

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration Arbitrator, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator, Litigation, Mediation Mediator

NRS 38.259  Certain written findings concerning arbitration required; admissibility of such findings at trial anew before jury; instructions to jury.

Posted on October 17, 2024October 17, 2024 By Jay Young No Comments on NRS 38.259  Certain written findings concerning arbitration required; admissibility of such findings at trial anew before jury; instructions to jury.

NRS 38.259  Certain written findings concerning arbitration required; admissibility of such findings at trial anew before jury; instructions to jury.       1.  If an action is submitted to arbitration in accordance with the provisions of NRS 38.250 to 38.259, inclusive, the arbitrator or panel of arbitrators shall, in addition to any other written findings of fact or conclusions…

Read More “NRS 38.259  Certain written findings concerning arbitration required; admissibility of such findings at trial anew before jury; instructions to jury.” »

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration Arbitrator, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator, Mediation Mediator

My Contract Requires AAA or JAMS Arbitration. Can I opt out?

Posted on February 5, 2024July 9, 2025 By Jay Young No Comments on My Contract Requires AAA or JAMS Arbitration. Can I opt out?

Yes.  Arbitration is a creature of contract.  If your contract requires arbitration, it is most likely enforceable.  However, where both parties recognize that the arbitration clause needs altering, they may do so by entering into an amendment before an arbitrator is appointed.  Once an arbitrator is appointed, the arbitrator must abide by the limitations on their powers contained in the contract.

Read More “My Contract Requires AAA or JAMS Arbitration. Can I opt out?” »

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration Arbitrator, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator, Mediation Mediator

Arbitration of Actions in District Courts and Justice Courts in Nevada

Posted on January 9, 2024February 3, 2024 By Jay Young No Comments on Arbitration of Actions in District Courts and Justice Courts in Nevada

ARBITRATION OF ACTIONS IN DISTRICT COURTS AND JUSTICE COURTS

NRS 38.250  Nonbinding arbitration of certain civil actions filed in district court required; nonbinding arbitration of certain civil actions filed in justice court authorized; effect of certain agreements by parties to use other alternative methods of resolving disputes.

1.  Except as otherwise provided in NRS 38.310:

(a) All civil actions filed in district court for damages, if the cause of action arises in the State of Nevada and the amount in issue does not exceed $50,000 per plaintiff, exclusive of attorney’s fees, interest and court costs, must be submitted to nonbinding arbitration in accordance with the provisions of NRS 38.250 to 38.259, inclusive, unless the parties have agreed or are otherwise required to submit the action to an alternative method of resolving disputes established by the Supreme Court pursuant to NRS 38.258, including, without limitation, a settlement conference, mediation or a short trial.

(b) A civil action for damages filed in justice court may be submitted to binding arbitration or to an alternative method of resolving disputes, including, without limitation, a settlement conference or mediation, if the parties agree to the submission.

2.  An agreement entered into pursuant to this section must be:

(a) Entered into at the time of the dispute and not be a part of any previous agreement between the parties;

(b) In writing; and

(c) Entered into knowingly and voluntarily.

Ê An agreement entered into pursuant to this section that does not comply with the requirements set forth in this subsection is void.

3.  As used in this section, “short trial” means a trial that is conducted, with the consent of the parties to the action, in accordance with procedures designed to limit the length of the trial, including, without limitation, restrictions on the amount of discovery requested by each party, the use of a jury composed of not more than eight persons and a specified limit on the amount of time each party may use to present the party’s case.

(Added to NRS by 1991, 1343; A 1993, 556, 1024; 1995, 1419, 2537, 2538; 1999, 852, 1379; 2003, 851; 2005, 391)

Read More “Arbitration of Actions in District Courts and Justice Courts in Nevada” »

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Arbitration Arbitrator, Business Law, Litigation

An Overview of the Federal Arbitration Act

Posted on January 9, 2024February 13, 2025 By Jay Young No Comments on An Overview of the Federal Arbitration Act

The Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §1 et seq. (the “FAA”), governs the enforcement of arbitration agreements.  9 U.S.C. §§ 1-2; Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co., 398 U.S. 395, 402 (1967).  The FAA established a national public policy favoring arbitration.  AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740, 1745 (2011)).  An arbitration agreement is enforceable under the FAA if it is in writing, relates to a commercial or maritime transaction, and manifests and agreement between the parties to arbitrate a dispute. 9 U.S.C § 1.  Contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce” are not covered by the FAA.  Id.

Read More “An Overview of the Federal Arbitration Act” »

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration Arbitrator, J, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator

Alternative Dispute Resolution Options in Las Vegas, Nevada

Posted on January 9, 2024February 3, 2024 By Jay Young No Comments on Alternative Dispute Resolution Options in Las Vegas, Nevada

Alternative Dispute Resolution Options in Las Vegas, Nevada
Alternative Dispute Resolution Options in Las Vegas, Nevada

There are many pathways to resolving legal disputes in Nevada other than litigating the matter in court.  Some of those pathways, paradoxically, begin with one of the parties filing a lawsuit in court.  Others are initiated by the parties without going to court.  This article explores the various pathways to Alternative Dispute Resolution (“ADR”), including arbitration and mediation and the rules governing them.

Read More “Alternative Dispute Resolution Options in Las Vegas, Nevada” »

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration Arbitrator, J, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator, Litigation, Mediation Mediator

Litigators, is it Time to Add Video Conference Mediations to Your Practice?

Posted on March 23, 2020 By Jay Young No Comments on Litigators, is it Time to Add Video Conference Mediations to Your Practice?

Last Friday I mediated a matter involving 8 parties, with two attorneys in New York, one in California, and four in Nevada.  Not even one of them came to my office.  We held the entire mediation remotely via video conference.  We held joint sessions with all participants, attorneys-only sessions, and we held caucuses in virtual…

Read More “Litigators, is it Time to Add Video Conference Mediations to Your Practice?” »

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration Arbitrator, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator, Mediation Mediator

Is My Arbitration Confidential?

Posted on August 7, 2019October 17, 2024 By Jay Young No Comments on Is My Arbitration Confidential?

Most questions regarding the enforceability of arbitration obligations begin with the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §1 et seq. (the “FAA”), which governs the enforcement of arbitration agreements.  9 U.S.C. §§ 1-2; Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co., 398 U.S. 395, 402 (1967).  The FAA was signed into law in 1925 and governs the enforcement of arbitration agreements, but does not require that the parties or the arbitrator hold the matter in confidence.

Nevada Revised Statutes, Chapter 38 is Nevada’s version of the Uniform Arbitration Act of 2000.  While it allows an arbitrator to issue a protective order against the disclosure of confidential and trade secret information (NRS 38.233(5)), it is silent on the issue of whether the parties to an arbitration or their arbitrator must keep the fact of the arbitration or its result a secret.

Read More “Is My Arbitration Confidential?” »

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration Arbitrator, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator, Litigation

U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Arbitrators, Not Courts, Decide Arbitrability

Posted on January 16, 2019February 12, 2025 By Jay Young No Comments on U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Arbitrators, Not Courts, Decide Arbitrability
Jay Young, Top Nevada Arbitrator and Mediator

In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Kavanaugh, the U.S. Supreme Court held that under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), “when the parties’ contract delegates the arbitrability question to an arbitrator, a court may not override the contract even if the court thinks that the arbitrability claim is wholly groundless.”  The decision in Henry Shein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc., issued January 8, 2019, addresses a split among the six circuit courts which have heard similar matters and vacates the decision of the Fifth Circuit which held that when a court determines that the request to have the matter arbitrated is “wholly groundless,” the court may deny a motion to allow an arbitrator to determine whether a matter is subject to arbitration.

Read More “U.S. Supreme Court Holds That Arbitrators, Not Courts, Decide Arbitrability” »

Share this:

  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration Arbitrator, J, Jay Young, Top Las Vegas, Nevada Mediator and Arbitrator

Posts pagination

1 2 … 4 Next
Disclaimer
Contact Us
  • Advanced Resolution Management

Visitor

3272383

Trending Posts

  • Mediation Tip #22: That’s When Something Snaps Up and Bites You

Archives

  •  2025
    • Dec 2025
    • Nov 2025
    • Oct 2025
    • Sep 2025
    • Aug 2025
    • Jul 2025
    • Feb 2025
    • Jan 2025
  •  2024
    • Dec 2024
    • Nov 2024
    • Oct 2024
    • Aug 2024
    • May 2024
    • Mar 2024
    • Feb 2024
    • Jan 2024
  •  2023
    • Dec 2023
  •  2021
    • Mar 2021
    • Feb 2021
    • Jan 2021
  •  2020
    • Dec 2020
    • Nov 2020
    • Oct 2020
    • Sep 2020
    • Aug 2020
    • Jul 2020
    • Jun 2020
    • May 2020
    • Apr 2020
    • Mar 2020
    • Jan 2020
  •  2019
    • Dec 2019
    • Nov 2019
    • Oct 2019
    • Sep 2019
    • Aug 2019
    • Apr 2019
    • Mar 2019
    • Feb 2019
    • Jan 2019
  •  2018
    • Dec 2018
    • Nov 2018
    • Oct 2018
    • Sep 2018
    • Aug 2018
    • Jul 2018
    • Mar 2018
    • Feb 2018
  •  2017
    • Nov 2017
    • Oct 2017
    • Sep 2017
    • Aug 2017
    • Jul 2017
    • Jun 2017
    • May 2017
    • Apr 2017
    • Mar 2017
    • Feb 2017
  •  2016
    • Sep 2016
    • Aug 2016
    • Jul 2016
    • Jun 2016
    • May 2016
    • Apr 2016
    • Mar 2016
    • Feb 2016
    • Jan 2016
  •  2015
    • Dec 2015
    • Nov 2015
    • Oct 2015
    • Sep 2015
    • Aug 2015
    • Jul 2015
    • Jun 2015
    • May 2015
    • Apr 2015
    • Mar 2015
    • Feb 2015
  •  2013
    • Jul 2013

Copyright © 2025 Nevada Law Blog.

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme

Nevada Law Blog
Proudly powered by WordPress Theme: PressBook.
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d