Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure; Rule 56

Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure

Rule 56. Summary Judgment

(a)     Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment. A party may move for summary judgment, identifying each claim or defense—or the part of each claim or defense—on which summary judgment is sought. The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The court should state on the record the reasons for granting or denying the motion.

(b)    Time to File a Motion. Unless a different time is set by local rule or the court orders otherwise, a party may file a motion for summary judgment at any time until 30 days after the close of all discovery.

(c)     Procedures.

(1)    Supporting Factual Positions. A party asserting that a fact cannot be or is genuinely disputed must support the assertion by:

(A)    citing to particular parts of materials in the record, including depositions, documents, electronically stored information, affidavits or declarations, stipulations (including those made for purposes of the motion only), admissions, interrogatory answers, or other materials; or

(B)    showing that the materials cited do not establish the absence or presence of a genuine dispute, or that an adverse party cannot produce admissible evidence to support the fact.

(2)    Objection That a Fact Is Not Supported by Admissible Evidence. A party may object that the material cited to support or dispute a fact cannot be presented in a form that would be admissible in evidence.

(3)    Materials Not Cited. The court need consider only the cited materials, but it may consider other materials in the record.

(4)    Affidavits or Declarations. An affidavit or declaration used to support or oppose a motion must be made on personal knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence, and show that the affiant or declarant is competent to testify on the matters stated.

(d)     When Facts Are Unavailable to the Nonmovant. If a nonmovant shows by affidavit or declaration that, for specified reasons, it cannot present facts essential to justify its opposition, the court may:

(1)     defer considering the motion or deny it;

(2)    allow time to obtain affidavits or declarations or to take discovery; or

(3)     issue any other appropriate order.

(e)     Failing to Properly Support or Address a Fact. If a party fails to properly support an assertion of fact or fails to properly address another party’s assertion of fact as required by Rule 56(c), the court may:

(1)     give an opportunity to properly support or address the fact;

(2)     consider the fact undisputed for purposes of the motion;

(3)     grant summary judgment if the motion and supporting materials—including the facts considered undisputed—show that the movant is entitled to it; or

(4)     issue any other appropriate order.

(f)      Judgment Independent of the Motion. After giving notice and a reasonable time to respond, the court may:

(1)     grant summary judgment for a nonmovant;

(2)     grant the motion on grounds not raised by a party; or

(3)    consider summary judgment on its own after identifying for the parties material facts that may not be genuinely in dispute.

(g)    Failing to Grant All the Requested Relief. If the court does not grant all the relief requested by the motion, it may enter an order stating any material fact—including an item of damages or other relief—that is not genuinely in dispute and treating the fact as established in the case.

(h)     Affidavit or Declaration Submitted in Bad Faith. If satisfied that an affidavit or declaration under this rule is submitted in bad faith or solely for delay, the court—after notice and a reasonable time to respond— may order the submitting party to pay the other party the reasonable expenses, including attorney fees, it incurred as a result. An offending party or attorney may also be held in contempt or subjected to other appropriate sanctions.


Advisory Committee Note—2019 Amendment

Subsection (a). Rule 56(a) retains the word “shall” consistent with the advisory committee notes to the 2010 amendments to FRCP 56 to preserve Wood v. Safeway, Inc., 121 Nev. 724, 121 P.3d 1026 (2005), and its progeny.

Subsection (d). Rule 56(d) modernizes the text of former NRCP 56(f) consistent with FRCP 56(d). The changes are stylistic and do not affect Choy v. Ameristar Casinos, Inc., 127 Nev. 870, 265 P.3d 698 (2011), which requires an affidavit to justify a request for a continuance of the summary judgment proceeding to conduct further discovery.

Subsection (e). The judicial discretion afforded under new Rule 56(e) ensures fairness in the individual case; it should not excuse inadequate motion practice.

Published by

Jay Young, Mediator and Arbitrator

Jay Young is a Las Vegas, Nevada attorney. His practice focuses on acting as an Arbitrator and Mediator. Mr. Young can be reached at 702.667.4828 or at The information provided on this site does not, and is not intended to constitute legal advice. You understand each legal matter should be considered to be unique and subject to varying results. You should not take or refrain from taking action based on any information contained on this website without first consulting legal counsel, as it is not intended to advise you on your particular matter. Further, you understand that no guarantee is given that the information contained herein is an accurate statement of the law at any given point in time, as the law is constantly changing. Guest bloggers are responsible for their own content, which is not to be construed as an article authored by Jay Young. Please see

Leave a Reply