By

Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure

Rule 15. Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

(a)     Amendments Before Trial.

(1)    Amending as a Matter of Course. A party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within:

(A)    21 days after serving it, or

(B)    if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier.

(2)    Other Amendments. In all other cases, a party may amend its pleading only with the opposing party’s written consent or the court’s leave. The court should freely give leave when justice so requires.

(3)    Time to Respond. Unless the court orders otherwise, any required response to an amended pleading must be made within the time remaining to respond to the original pleading or within 14 days after service of the amended pleading, whichever is later.

(b)     Amendments During and After Trial.

(1)    Based on an Objection at Trial. If, at trial, a party objects that evidence is not within the issues raised in the pleadings, the court may permit the pleadings to be amended. The court should freely permit an amendment when doing so will aid in presenting the merits and the objecting party fails to satisfy the court that the evidence would prejudice that party’s action or defense on the merits. The court may grant a continuance to enable the objecting party to meet the evidence.

(2)    For Issues Tried by Consent. When an issue not raised by the pleadings is tried by the parties’ express or implied consent, it must be treated in all respects as if raised in the pleadings. A party may move—at any time, even after judgment—to amend the pleadings to conform them to the evidence and to raise an unpleaded issue. But failure to amend does not affect the result of the trial of that issue.

(c)   Relation Back of Amendments. An amendment to a pleading relates back to the date of the original pleading when:

(1)   the amendment asserts a claim or defense that arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set out—or attempted to be set out— in the original pleading; or

(2)   the amendment changes a party or the naming of a party against whom a claim is asserted, if Rule 15(c)(1) is satisfied and if, within the period provided by Rule 4(e) for serving the summons and complaint, the party to be brought in by amendment:

(A)   received such notice of the action that it will not be prejudiced in defending on the merits; and

(B)   knew or should have known that the action would have been brought against it, but for a mistake concerning the proper party’s identity.

(d)   Supplemental Pleadings. On motion and reasonable notice, the court may, on just terms, permit a party to serve a supplemental pleading setting out any transaction, occurrence, or event that happened after the date of the pleading to be supplemented. The court may permit supplementation even though the original pleading is defective in stating a claim or defense. The court may order that the opposing party plead to the supplemental pleading within a specified time.

Advisory Committee Note—2019 Amendment

Rule 15(a)(1) tracks FRCP 15(a)(1) and permits a plaintiff to amend as a matter of course later than former NRCP 15(a) allowed. Rule 15(c)(2) incorporates text from FRCP 15(c)(1)(C). Rule 15(c) governs relation-back of amendments generally, while Rule 10(d) governs replacing a named party for a fictitiously named party. The express provision Rule 10(d) makes for pleading fictitious defendants, which the FRCP does not have, avoids the problem that has arisen in federal cases attempting to apply FRCP 15(c)(1)(C) to fictitious defendants. While Rule 15(c) and Rule 10(d) are distinct tests, if a fictitious-party replacement does not meet the Rule 10(d) test, it may be treated as an amendment to add a party under Rule 15 if the standards in Rule 15 are met.

About the Author

Jay Young is a Las Vegas, Nevada attorney. His practice focuses on acting as an Arbitrator and Mediator.

Mr. Young can be reached at 702.667.4868 or at jay@h2law.com.

The information provided on this site does not, and is not intended to constitute legal advice. You understand each legal matter should be considered to be unique and subject to varying results. You should not take or refrain from taking action based on any information contained on this website without first consulting legal counsel, as it is not intended to advise you on your particular matter. Further, you understand that no guarantee is given that the information contained herein is an accurate statement of the law at any given point in time, as the law is constantly changing. Please see http://nevadalaw.info/disclaimer

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: