By

REBUTTABLE PRESUMPTION OF MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE; JURY QUESTION AS TO BASIC FACTS; PRESUMPTION RENDERED CONCLUSIVE (SHOULD IT ARISE) BY FAILURE TO REBUT AS A MATTER OF LAW

If you find by a preponderance of the evidence that:

[A foreign substance other than medication or a prosthetic device was unintentionally left within the body of a patient following surgery;]

[An explosion or fire originating in a substance used in treatment occurred in the course of treatment;]

[An unintended burn caused by heat, radiation or chemicals was suffered in the course of medical care;]

[An injury was suffered during the course of treatment to a part of the body not directly involved in such treatment or proximate thereto;] [or]

[A surgical procedure was performed on the wrong patient or the wrong organ, limb or part of a patient’s body;] then you should also find that the [personal injury] [death] was caused by negligence.

NEV. J.I. 6.18

NRS 41A.100

 

About the Author

Jay Young is a Las Vegas, Nevada attorney. His practice focuses on business law, business litigation, and acting as an Arbitrator and Mediator.

Mr. Young can be reached at 702.667.4868 or at jay@h2law.com.