By

GENERAL VERDICT WITH SPECIAL FINDINGS; STRICT PRODUCTS LIABILITY ACTION

We further find as follows on the particular questions of fact herein:

Question No. 1: Did the defendant [manufacture, sell, etc.] the product in question?

Answer “yes” or “no.”

Answer: _______________________________________________

Question No. 2: Was the product defective?

Answer “yes” or “no.”

Answer: _______________________________________________

Question No. 3: Did the defect in the product exist when the product left the defendant’s possession?

Answer “yes” or “no.”

Answer: _______________________________________________

Question No. 4: Was the product used in a manner which was reasonably foreseeable by the defendant?

Answer “yes” or “no.”

Answer: _______________________________________________

Question No. 5: Was the defect a [proximate] [legal] cause of damage or injury to the plaintiff?

Answer “yes” or “no.”

Answer:

DATED this______ day of__________________ , 200

FOREMAN

NEV. J.I. 12.02

About the Author

Jay Young is a Las Vegas, Nevada attorney. His practice focuses on acting as an Arbitrator and Mediator.

Mr. Young can be reached at 702.667.4868 or at jay@h2law.com.

The information provided on this site does not, and is not intended to constitute legal advice. You understand each legal matter should be considered to be unique and subject to varying results. You should not take or refrain from taking action based on any information contained on this website without first consulting legal counsel, as it is not intended to advise you on your particular matter. Further, you understand that no guarantee is given that the information contained herein is an accurate statement of the law at any given point in time, as the law is constantly changing. Please see http://nevadalaw.info/disclaimer

 

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: