By

ASSUMPTION OF RISK

The defendant contends that the plaintiff assumed the risk of the harm that he suffered. To establish that the plaintiff assumed this risk, the defendant must show, by a preponderance of the evidence; that:

  1. The plaintiff actually knew and appreciated the particular risk or danger created by the defect;
  1. The plaintiff voluntarily encountered this risk while realizing the danger; and
  1. The plaintiffs decision to voluntarily encounter the known risk was unreasonable.

A person who thus assumes the risk is not entitled to recover for damages which resulted from the danger to which he exposed himself.

 

NEV. J.I. 7.08

About the Author

Jay Young is a Las Vegas, Nevada attorney. His practice focuses on business law, business litigation, and acting as an Arbitrator and Mediator. Peers have named him an AV-Rated Lawyer, Best Lawyers, a Top 100 Super Lawyers in the Mountain States multiple years, and to the Legal Elite and Top Lawyers lists for many years. Mr. Young has been appointed a part time Judge, a Special Master to the Clark County, Nevada Business Court, as an arbitrator by the Nevada Supreme Court. He has been appointed as an arbitrator or mediator of well over 250 legal disputes from business disputes to personal injury matters. He has been named Best Lawyers for Arbitration. Mr. Young is a respected author of ten books, including A Litigator’s Guide to Federal Evidentiary Objections, A Litigator’s Guide to the Federal Rules of Evidence, and the Federal Court Civil Litigation Checklist.
Mr. Young can be reached at 702.667.4868 or at jay@h2law.com.

 

Leave a Reply

Visit Us On TwitterVisit Us On FacebookVisit Us On Google PlusVisit Us On YoutubeVisit Us On Linkedin